Lawyerd-supervised content takedowns at scale, grounded in the Berne Convention, EU Directive 2019/790, the DMCA and GDPR Article 17. For companies and individuals whose brand, name, logo or work is being used without authorisation.
Counsel reviews every intake personally · NDA-first · Response within one business day
We remove unauthorised use of brand and copyrighted material from the open internet. Defamatory articles in regional press. Clone domains and phishing pages. Affiliate ads bidding on your brand. Counterfeit listings. Deepfake endorsements. Search results that no longer belong on the first page.
The mechanism is the same regardless of industry: named statute, qualified evidence, fast filing, persistent follow-through. Volume that a law firm cannot economically match. Legal robustness that a SaaS platform cannot provide.
At-scale weekly operations across 30+ jurisdictions.
Berne, EU 2019/790, DMCA, GDPR Article 17. No payments. No threats.
Reviewed personally before filing. Not delegated to a marketing team.
Send the URLs and brief context through the form. Counsel reviews every intake personally and responds within one business day. NDA-first, no call required.
Qualified URLs are filed with hosts, registrars’ abuse desks, platforms and search engines in parallel — Berne, EU 2019/790, DMCA, GDPR Article 17.
A removal counts only when the content is confirmed gone. You receive evidence-grade reporting suitable for compliance and licensing files.
Each industry has its own page. The mechanism is the same; the contexts are different.
Clone casinos, look-alike domains, impersonators and paid hit-pieces, removed under named statute for operators licensed in Curaçao, Malta, Anjouan and the UK.
For operators iGaming · StudiosTactical enforcement layer for breakout game titles. Clone-domain takedowns, affiliate page sweeps, ad removal.
For game studios Trading · Prop firmsFake reviews, defamatory “scam” hit-pieces and clone sites aimed at proprietary trading firms — challenged on lawful grounds.
For prop firms Finance · BrokersFake and defamatory reviews on WikiFX and Forex Peace Army, clone sites impersonating your brokerage. Genuine regulator warnings stay.
For brokers Crypto · Web3Forum FUD, Telegram impostors, phishing-domain enforcement and app-store clone removal.
For crypto businesses Digital productsPirated courses, cracked software, leaked educational material and unauthorised redistribution.
Via confidential intake Retail · FashionCounterfeit listings on marketplaces, social commerce, and unauthorised resale of brand-protected products.
Via confidential intake IdentityDeepfake endorsements, channel impersonation, leaked private content and identity-misuse campaigns.
Via confidential intakeDoesn’t fit? Describe it in the confidential intake
Founded Lawyerd in 2021 after eight years as senior IP specialist at Plarium. Personally reviews every engagement the practice takes on.
JurisdictionsCoordinated negative-press campaign across three jurisdictions. Qualified down from 2,600 candidate URLs. Approximately 85% success rate on actionable filings.
2,600 candidates → 700 removals · ~85% actionable rateContinuous takedown operation across registrar complaints, hosting abuse and search delisting. Reduced clone visibility by 80% within 90 days.
47 clones · −80% visibility · 90 daysIdentity-misuse content across YouTube, TikTok and Telegram. First filing within 18 hours of intake; bulk resolution within 14 days.
First filing · 18 hours · Bulk resolution · 14 daysDetails abstracted. Full case files available under NDA on request.
Paste a URL into our lookup and get the hosting provider actually serving the content, with its verified abuse mailbox and a prefilled notice you can send from your own inbox.
→ Open the abuse-contact lookupThe median across our practice is six days from authorised filing to confirmed removal, and the first notices in a new matter typically go out within 24–48 hours of intake. Complex or litigated matters take longer.
Every notice is filed under a named statute — the Berne Convention, EU Directive 2019/790, the US DMCA (17 U.S.C. §512) or GDPR Article 17 — depending on the content and the jurisdiction. We do not pay for removal and we do not threaten; we file.
No — and a provider who does is a red flag. Approximately 85% of our qualified filings succeed. Whether content qualifies is exactly what the initial audit establishes before an engagement is scoped.
With a confidential intake: send the URLs and brief context through the form. Counsel reviews every intake personally and responds within one business day, NDA-first. A 48-hour audit then scopes the engagement before anything is signed.
Pricing is scoped after the audit and discussed under NDA — it depends on volume, platforms and jurisdictions involved. Our guide on how takedown pricing works explains the structure.
Engagements begin with a confidential intake. Leave a brief note — counsel responds within one business day.